Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Michael"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
Special procedures are either an individual (called "Special Rapporteur" or "Independent Expert") or a working group composed of five members, one from each of the five United Nations regional groupings: Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, Eastern Europe and the Western group. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Mary Welek Atwell, Sexual Harassment in the United States: Analyzing the Hostile Environment (2020). [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:08 am
He was 89.Judge Pollak, who served on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was widely regarded as one of the leading members of the judiciary in the country. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
New York.February 23, 2018.Natalie Jean-Baptiste, Plaintiff, pro se.NCO Financial Services Inc & Access Group Inc., Defendants, represented by Michael G. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
United StatesKaren McDougal v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
United States is cited in the following article: Nick Katz, How the States can Fix Sell: Forced Medication of Mentally Ill Criminal Defendants in State Courts, 69 Duke L.J. 735 (2019). 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Boehm and Michael D. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
(IPBiz) Australia Patentology Newsbytes – including Uniloc’s Aussie inventor responds to appeal decision in Microsoft case (Patentology) Canada Supreme Court will lead tech law in 2011 (Michael Geist) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 2: Research in Motion Ltd. v Kik Interactive Inc (IPblog) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 3: Fraser Beach v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
” The anchor declared that the attackers had earned “the evil distinction of having perpetrated a criminal outrage almost unique in America’s history. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
