Search for: "UP Smith" Results 641 - 660 of 20,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
" Those were the early days of the Worldwide Web or Cyberspace -- an age of flying toasters and dial-up-phone-mo... [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” The suggestion that Trump’s legal troubles are nothing more than an effort by Democrats to discredit him has been taken up as a rallying cry by many other Republicans.Take, as one example, Senator Marsha Blackburn, who has said, “The American people see this for what it is—political prosecution…. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 1:06 pm by Ilya Somin
I would, however, note a few relevant caveats to Smith's thesis. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 4:02 am by jonathanturley
We also have roughly 8,000 people who have signed up for alerts by emails. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am by Bill Henderson
The task of breaking up the massive concentration of wealth and power fell to another group of white-shoe lawyers, who left private practice to serve in the DOJ—George Wickersham of Calawalder, Philander Knox of present-day Reed Smith, Thurman Arnold of Arnold & Porter, among others. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:17 am by Bob Ambrogi
But I am equally fascinated to add up the numbers at the end of the year and see which topics and guests you, the listeners, found most interesting. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 4:20 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Friday morning read: US Supreme Court officially asked to take up Trump’s 14th Amendment issue (Zach Montellaro, Politico) She lost her gun rights for passing a bad check. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
However presented, in whatever fancy dress it might be offered up. . . .and consumed by humans who appear to have been starving for its nourishment. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 11:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
In May, Jessica Kuchta-Miller, Ellen Miller, and Steve Prevaux presented a session to the National Association of College and University Attorneys; in June, IOA published a new resource identifying and explaining U.S. case law, statutes, and regulations: "An Overview of Ombuds Confidentiality"; and in September, IOA sponsored a Clery Center 2023 Virtual Summit.Cheers to the organizers of the California Caucus of College and University Ombuds, which marked half a century in a sold out event… [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm
Link.The article quotes this Truth Social post of Trump's:“THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN, LIED TO CONGRESS, CHEATED ON FISA, RIGGED A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ALLOWED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, MANY FROM PRISONS & MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, TO INVADE OUR COUNTRY, SCREWED UP IN AFGHANISTAN, & JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH, ARE COMING AFTER ME, AT LEVELS OF PERSECUTION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN OUR COUNTRY??? [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 5:47 am by Michael C. Dorf
Barely were the electrons dry on my Verdict column (which went up at midnight as Thursday became Friday) when the Court half-mooted it by denying Smith's petition.(2) Various commentators have rightly pointed out that the Court's rejection of Smith's petition does not necessarily reflect any view on the merits. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Trump and the special counsel, Jack Smith, over whether the former president can be prosecuted for his actions while in office" (NYT).This is the case that the prosecution has been trying to speed up. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:05 am by Associated Press
The Supreme Court said Friday it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 1:00 am
”▫️Known for addressing extremely controversial topics, her Sunday — Christmas Eve — show is sure to rile up thousands.▫️While we’re not at liberty to disclose the program’s details, you must check it out. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm by Amy Howe
” Two days later, the justices declined to take up Smith’s petition for review. [read post]
” The move comes after Smith asked the court to take up the issue in the 2020 election interference case against Trump on December 11. [read post]