Search for: "US v. Boss"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am
In Dynamex, the court held workers are employees if: His/her job forms part of the company’s core business operations; Bosses direct the way the work is done; The worker has not established an independent trade/business. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am
: Stambler v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– CTIA’s opposition to DMCA exemptions proposed by EFF and Wireless Alliance (EFF) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit upholds ruling finding editor of 2600 magazine violated anti-trafficking provision of the DMCA by linking to DeCSS hosting sites (Media Wonk) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Authors’ Guild asserts Amazon’s Kindle device that reads book… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Walkowiak v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857) [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Relying primarily on the Second Circuit decision in Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
(`Celebrity’), Boss Limousine, LLC (`Boss’), and Duct Dusters, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Rick: Bit like most of us in the rock biz. [read post]
17 May 2014, 10:57 am
In Malphurs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:31 pm
In Couch v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 10:57 am
In Malphurs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
"The dictionary of law is written by the bosses of order," writes [Abbie] Hoffman. [read post]
The D.C. Circuit Holds That Safety Valve Is Still Available Even If A Person Comes To The Truth Late
17 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
But in his appeal in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
See Time, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
"Whether a non-syndicated column that is, for example, “printed, downloadable, or recorded on electronic media,” TMEP Section 1202.07(a), is a good in trade should be analyzed using the same standard we use to assess goods in trade issues in other contexts.The Board therefore adopted a new test, based on Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376, 103 USPQ2d 1672, 1676 (Fed. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
(See Gallaher v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
["The concept of using 'p**** so wet' as a rhetorical device in a song is neither original nor unique to Plaintiff, and, in any event, '[c]opyright does not protect ideas or themes.'"] The key passage, from Judge Andrew Carter's opinion Tuesday in Jones v. [read post]
