Search for: "US v. McDonald" Results 641 - 660 of 1,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 5:52 am
As explained by the district court, Grecia alleged that McDonald's uses the claimed systems when a McDonald's customer purchases a McDonald's food item with a credit card, the credit card company's server acts as a receipt module by receiving the primary account number ("PAN") assigned to the credit card. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* Friday FunInternkat Ellie Wilson brings us a weekly roundup, including the new MIP European Patent Reform Forum, and University of New Hampshire's search for a new Dean.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and  more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on… [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:15 am by Andres
” A more favourable case for Cyriak is Temple Island Collection Ltd v New English Teas, where a tea company used in an ad the similar setting of an iconic souvenir picture featuring a red bus in front of Westminster. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
Eleonora Rosati brings you up to speed with the Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier.Friday FantasiesNews roundup from Nick Smallwood: IPWeek Singapore, IP & international investment law, US inaugurates Anti-Counterfeiting Month, NZ Trans-Tasman Patent Attorneys (Amendment) Bill & Report from the Case Management Hearing on the legal challenges to Brexit.Patent Litigation as a branding tool: Huawei v SamsungClaim and counterclaim in Huawei v Samsung. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:40 pm
* Quia timet, de minimis and Novartis v Hospira: Mr Justice Arnold speeds through Napp v Dr Reddy pain disputeKatfriend Amy Crouch brings us the two decisions and developments in the Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz litigation. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in the High Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Instead, because ostensible agency “may be implied from circumstances,” the issue of whether the franchisee’s employees “reasonably believed” the franchisee was acting as McDonald’s agent, thus providing a basis to impose liability on McDonald’s, appropriately could be decided on a classwide basis (Ochoa v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
Nick Smallwood brings us this case.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 103 [week ending on Sunday 3 July] Publicity Rights v First Amendment | EU Trade marks Article 28 Declarations | Non-EU UK in the UPC? [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15–16 March 2016. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Gather broken glass in bags for re-use. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:38 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The excellent coverage on the Cornerstones Barristers website said: “Unless and until there is a clear rejection by Strasbourg of the decision in McDonald v McDonald, it seems that this landmark ruling represents the end of the road for the domestic article 8 debate on private sector possession proceedings. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 The Supreme Court has finally decided on the issue that has been hanging over private sector possession claims since Pinnock and Powell – whether article 8 proportionality of eviction defence might also apply to the private sector as well as to public body landlords. [read post]