Search for: "US v. PARIS"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The founders were not gods who walked for too short a time among us. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:11 pm
Is Article 6ter of the Paris Convention (S4 and S55-59 UK Trade Mark Act) wide enough to assist them? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
I actually took a year off between college and law school, living in Paris, studying international relations, and traveling for months all over Europe, including, in addition to the usual places, two weeks in the Soviet Union over Christmas and hitchhiking treks through Brittany and Ireland. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm
v=7W33HRc1A6c [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 5:47 am
The Paris Court cited the CJEU Deckmyn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
It was submitted that the company, incorporated under Liechtenstein law, was permitted to use any of the names "Aktiengesellschaft" (or "AG") and "Limited" (or "Ltd"), that it had been migrated to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and registered there under the name "Tenaris Connections Limited", and that the registration neither created a new legal entity nor affected the identity or continuity of the company as previously constituted. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
The BBC informs us that a letter bomb exploded at the International Monetary Fund in Paris, injuring the hands and face of the employee who opened it. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
On useful purpose, the Judge held that the question was whether the declarations would serve a useful purpose in the UK, as a declaration that is sought solely for the benefit of foreign courts would rarely be justified. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:02 am
Burke, 84 U.S. 453 (1873). [9] Keeler v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 5:49 am
Merchant v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Lederer de Paris Fifth Ave., Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:34 pm
Best Value Kosher Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
by Dennis Crouch The first rounds of merits briefs have now been submitted to the Supreme Court in Impression Prods. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
De minimis and Quia Timet injunctions Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) provides a useful summary of the law relating to the application of the de minimis principle and of the interplay between de minimis and quia timet injunctions. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:30 am
Haggenmacher & V. [read post]
