Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 12:30 am
Powell, 153 S.W.3d 736, 745 (Tex. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
The strategy allegedly earned Kraft over $5.4 million in profits (CFTC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:10 am
” You can read the decision in Powell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
There may have been good reasons why it was not practicable to leave the appellant where he was and put the alternative accommodation in the same road to the use to which it was wished to put his flat. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
It was one of the express trusts authorized by statute, to receive the rents and profits of lands, and apply them to the use of any person during the life of such person, or for a shorter period, and suspended the power of alienation of the real estate and the absolute ownership of the personal property embraced in the trust, during the trust term; and although the trust might have terminated before the expiration of Mrs. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:27 pm
Professor Powell mentions no authority for the critical footnote comment. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
In San Francisco v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
Money used for the development of water from the Bear River and the Colorado River is subject to the repayment provisions of the Bear River Development Act (Title 73, Chapter 26) and the Lake Powell Pipeline Act (Title 73, Chapter 28), respectively. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
See Powell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:31 am
In Powell v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:32 am
The suit requests unspecified damages (Sonterra Master Capital Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In Powell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Aug. 5, 2010) (absent receipts, plaintiffs “failed to show how the potentially millions of putative class members could be ascertained using objective criteria that are administratively feasible”); Charron v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:35 pm
Zero of the Scranton, PA office of Powell Law. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
…[I]t seems to me that there must be the possibility that there was some procedure then or now capable of being used in the county court for the purpose of having that claim adjudicated upon. [read post]
