Search for: "US v. Robert Black" Results 641 - 660 of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bruen) and one repudiating abortion rights (Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Looking backwards, though, it is interesting to think about the Court’s move in a more conservative direction in terms of the changes in its Commerce Clause rulings – from Justice Robert Jackson’s opinion in Wickard v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| Have you used the IP5 Collaborative Search and Examination (CS&E) pilot? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm
 Not so, said CJ Roberts. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Demisse Habteselasie
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 I actually had a better seat than Nina Totenberg from NPR and Bill Mears of CNN; both were present to hear the opinions read from the bench.The high-point from that session was Chief Justice John Roberts reading the 6-3 majority opinion in the case of Humanitarian Law Project v Holder; followed by Justice Stephen Breyer reading his dissent (joined by Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm by Jim Sedor
Others expressed concern about how the data could be used against them if their employees are not diverse enough for the lawmakers. [read post]