Search for: "US v. Under Seal" Results 641 - 660 of 2,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Lucas Guttentag
This shadow immigration expulsion regime is not part of some coherent public health or safety plan to seal our borders or to diminish the risk of COVID-19’s introduction into the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:19 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, back in 1999, the RIAA was a little-known trade group and a lawsuit by a group of record labels largely slipped under the radar. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm by Ryan E. Long
” The video is satire -- and thus likely protected as fair use under the Copyright Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Under normal, non-shortage conditions, a N95 is discarded after a single use—a visit to a patient or a session of construction work. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 4:38 am by SHG
The People argue that under People v Mingo (12 NY3d 563, 571-573 [2009]), we should accept this one-sentence assertion at face value as “reliable hearsay,” but doing so extends Mingo beyond the analytic boundaries of its holding, absolves the People of their burden of persuasion, and renders the SORA proceeding a farce. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am by Kelsey Clinton
” Additionally, the court notes that, under In re: Sealed Case, a lower court’s determination will be reversed only if there is abuse of discretion. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The video deposition is such a document, defined as "any item entered into evidence at a public session of trial" except for matters entered under seal. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  To use the words of the statute:  it's an infraction when "a person [] has in their possession on their person, while driving a motor vehicle upon a highway or on lands . . . a receptacle containing cannabis or cannabis products . . . which has been opened or has a seal broken. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 713 for illegal use of the presidential seal violate the First Amendment under Alvarez, but the Court need not reach these arguments.} [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Attempts to unseal can work even years after the sealing, see, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]