Search for: "US v. William Cross" Results 641 - 660 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 11:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
Also precluded from use on cross-examination was the March 10, 1992 conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle (class A misdemeanor) as the case was too remote in time and the facts were too similar to the facts of the case as bar. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Cross-Border Data Flows, the GDPR, and Data Governance, 29 Wash. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Williams, 17-1641. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:52 pm by Dan Flynn
”    Her cross-examination by ABC’s attorneys from the prominent Williams & Connolly law firm in Washington D.C. was tough and spirited, but Brashears was still left smiling. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
Reed, __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 2341078 (2011) and this, very briefly, is how it arose: Based on information that [William] Reed, a student at South Dakota State University, was using a chat and file-sharing program to download and share child pornography, federal agents conducted a warrant search of Reed's residence on September 19, 2007. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am by Ilya Somin
Raich—(a terrible federalism decision holding that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce authorizes a ban on the possession of marijuana that never crossed state lines or was sold in any commercial transaction)—and Kelo v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The child’s mother and journalists objected, but Mr Justice Williams ruled in the man’s favour after considering evidence from a psychologist at preliminary hearings. [read post]