Search for: "USA v. Doe" Results 641 - 660 of 4,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 4:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Federal prosecutors identified Doe and Roe as part of their investigation and told Doe and Roe's parents what Boland had done. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:36 am by George Basharis
Trade dress protects only features that are ornamental or arbitrary and therefore identify a product’s source, it does not protect useful features that are normally protected by patent law, the court explained (Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Immortalana Inc., 158 A.D.3d 576, 577 (1st Dep’t 2018); Macquarie Capital (USA) v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Eugene Volokh
[But a] dopting the too-common practice of reading extra immunity into statutes where it does not belong, see Baxter v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm by Guangjian Tu
Backgrounds of the facts The plaintiff, Brentwood Industries, Inc. a USA based company, entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) along with a Supplementary Agreement with three Chinese companies (collectively, “Respondents”) in April 2010. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In contrast of course, the USA does satisfy these criteria, and it presents a growing extra-territorial risk to Asian companies through American Depository Receipt (ADR) litigation. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am by Florence Campbell Jones
First, the decision that English courts have jurisdiction to determine the terms of a global licence pursuant to, in this case, a French law contract, which does not provide for a mechanism to resolve disputes over the terms of such a licence. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
That case, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Steamless USA, LLC, stems from a 2007 contract between a contractor and steel manufacturer for the construction of mills in the manufacturer’s steel plant. [read post]