Search for: "United States ex rel. v. Exelis, Inc."
Results 641 - 660
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
” West Virginia ex rel. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 8:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
” Rukoro, 976 F.3d at 224 (quoting Zappia, 215 F.3d at 251); see also Restatement (Fourth) of Foreign Rels. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
Similarly, in Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 11:56 am
Poe ex. rel. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
First up is United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Cook & Tommy Shaw Found. ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply10-627Title: Extreme Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Barron ex rel. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
Ohio, ex rel. [read post]