Search for: "United States of America v. Page" Results 641 - 660 of 1,376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
Its “customers” are other elements of the United States government that rely on its surveillance. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am by Sebastian Brady
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:12 am by SHG
There is no question that images ridiculing religion, however offensive they may be to believers, qualify as protected free speech in the United States and most Western democracies. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: The George Washington Law Review’s new “On the Docket” page features commentary on recent Court decisions, including comments by GW law professors on the Alabama redistricting cases, Young, and B&B Hardware v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
S. 758: A bill to establish an Interagency Trade Enforcement Center in the Office of the United States Trade Representative <> Coal Ash Resources page updated - NW&RA Waste & Recycling Asso  has updated its  Coal Ash Resources page with a new technical brief on the effects of coal ash on an MSW landfill. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by SHG
When the ACLU prevailed in National Socialist Party of America v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
Following the news that the United States will begin allowing the sail of armed drones to foreign countries, the New America Foundation has compiled data on the 85 co [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
I begin by summarizing four key takeaways from the pages that follow: The administration has not abandoned its claims of authority to attack ISIL under Article II or the 2001 AUMF, rendering the constraints set forth in the draft AUMF largely (though not entirely) academic as a legal matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]