Search for: "United States v. Alexander" Results 641 - 660 of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm by Benjamin Beaton
United States, 398 U.S. 333, 354 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff begins his affidavit in support of the motion by stating, in ¶ 1, "I Alexander Breytman the last of the Mohicans have chutzpah to make this affidavit in support and against dishonorable Arthur M. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff begins his affidavit in support of the motion by stating, in ¶ 1, "I Alexander Breytman the last of the Mohicans have chutzpah to make this affidavit in support and against dishonorable Arthur M. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
Webster also noted that Timothy Pickering, then secretary of state, “sent to me for the original paper, and had the letter in the original with a translation, if I mistake not, published in the Gazette of the United States”. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In his deep analysis of organizations like the State Policy Network and the Association of Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Alexander Hertel-Ferndandez, in his book State Capture, found that these organizations have had profound effects on state legislative initiatives. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm by DougW
John Larimer, United States Navy cryptologist. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Alexander Russy via Flickr) Two decades ago, before the southwest water crisis reached its current state of urgency, the Navajo Nation sued the United States to require the government to assess Navajo water needs and develop a plan to meet those needs. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
 Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdownThe Supreme Court was live online to hear Tom Mitcheson QC (supported by  Andrew Waugh QC and leading Stuart Baran) for Eli Lilly against Danny Alexander QC (leading Thomas Raphael QC) for Actavis.Oldie but goldie - when is old prior art a suitable starting point for inventive step analysis? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
  Alexander adds: "Q4 actually asks not for the "scale" but the "scope" of protection ("Schutzumfang"). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 So much, incidentally, for the Lincolnian theory that the United States had been a singular entity since 1774, let alone the Declaration of Independence in 1776--the four-score-and-seven-years prior to 1776. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Robert Brammer
United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), but this time the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:12 pm by Emily Root
The Wine Group, Case No. 10-4202, the Court affirmed a preliminary injunction in favor of the distributors against the Wine Group (the third-largest wine manufacturer in the United States). [read post]