Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
DHS and United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
In that case, (known as Philips v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
Cuba's sovereignty over Guantanamo is an irrelevancy, as is the United States' lack thereof; it is de facto control over territory and individuals, not the right to exercise such control, that enables either the protection or the violation of the rights of individuals. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
Hurtado was caught driving a truck loaded with cocaine across the border, for which he was paid $3,500. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Federal Indian law is often viewed as counterintuitive because it does not comport with the general principles of public law—most paradigmatically, the federal government recognizes the sovereignty of Native nations to operate as enclave states within the territorial borders of the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:43 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (Declaratory Relief; Tribal Health Organizations)United States v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 2:58 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:14 am
“It is a long-standing principle of American law that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
United States Customs and Border Patrol, 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:52 am
This portion of the law addresses the question at the heart of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:03 am
United States, 516 F.3d 1340, 1346 (Fed.Cir.2008)... [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
