Search for: "United States v. Detente" Results 641 - 660 of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 8:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:14 pm
No answers to questions by Eric and Deborah, but more questions about Munaf: There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm by Steve Vladeck
§ 4001(a), provides that “[n]o citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
These persons do not assert that the state may not subject anyone to the harsher form of detention, nor even--as they would have to assert in a SDP case--that the state must satisfy strict scrutiny in order to place someone in the harsher form of detention. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
My family moved to the United States from South Korea when I was six years old. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:22 am by Benjamin Wittes
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 10 (D.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 11:18 am by David Markus
SREBNICK: The right to be released on bail, that is, the right not to be detained all the way until trial, under this Court's precedent in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Harry Larson
United States set the stage for the detainer debate by significantly limiting state authority to enforce civil provisions of federal immigration law. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am by Larkin Reynolds
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]