Search for: "United States v. Felt" Results 641 - 660 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington entered an injunction before his original order--a TRO--would have expired. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
He felt that petitioner did not make a rational choice to kill, but felt compelled to act as he did and for a short time lost control. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:01 am by Kalvis Golde
It is our experience that current constitutional law doctrines are best understood as the result of a 200+ year process of decision-making by a single court: the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
Defendant felt his mother may have been a “witch at various times in the past. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
All his clerks have felt the power of his mentorship; he lifts up the people around him. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
United States, the Court ruled that a pardon carried an “imputation of guilt” and accepting a pardon was “an admission of guilt. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am by Ben
These have argued to not substantially be the base of the challenge as a small standard selection and arrangement gets a fairly thin copyright protection due to the “creative” standard of Originality being prevalent in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:32 pm by Brett Holubeck
An employer has the option to unilaterally withdraw recognition from a union that has lost support of a majority of the employees  in the bargaining unit as held in the Supreme Court’s decision in Allentown Mack Sales & Service v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Don't just listen to me on this, though; consider the 8-to-1 decision in Thomas v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
” Placing so much responsibility in the hands of “a couple hundred unaccountable staffers,” moreover, contributes to the concern that there is a “conspiratorial deep state [that] threatens the nation’s representative democracy. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Swagway v. [read post]