Search for: "United States v. Gray" Results 641 - 660 of 980
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
On 2 March 2011, the Court of Appeal dismissed the application for permission to appeal in the case of Kaschke v Gray. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Phone-hacking Steve Coogan and Andy Gray (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Tech industry unhappy with US Patent Reform Bill (IP Watch) US Patents The US could end up hurting its own companies as a result of the Huawei 3Leaf decision (IAM) Computer software patents in the US (Tangible IP) From Marconi to Microsoft: The rise and fall of the ‘25 percent rule’ for determining damages from patent infringement (ipeg) Paul Allen’s NPE is the… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
Supreme Court case and it is an important term discussed, written about, and fought over in Federal and State Courts every day across the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Bridgeport Fittings (Gray on Claims) CAFC: The teeth of KSR: Obviousness on summary judgment: Tokai Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:29 am by Peter Hirtle
  ("[Section 109] applies to copies made abroad only if the copies have been sold in the United States by the copyright owner or with its authority. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm by Bankruptcy Legal Group
This time, the means test made it all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
The Independent has a discussion of another, as yet unreported, “phone hacking” case, Gray v News Group. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:45 am
Omega SA that original, copyrighted works legitimately purchased overseas cannot be imported into the United States and re-sold here under the first sale doctrine of U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]