Search for: "United States v. Judge" Results 641 - 660 of 31,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Yesterday, the United States’ lawyers filed this motion to file a surreply, making this explosive allegation:  ”4. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm by Marcus Fulton
Roberts in an opinion authored by Senior Judge Johnson, and a memorandum opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:28 am by Tom Smith
It is apt to get Judge Sullivan’s attention that the only case the panel cited is United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
In the Courts The case of Apple v Epic has concluded with Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers granting a permanent injunction that said Apple will no longer be allowed to prohibit developers providing links or other communications that direct users away from in app purchasing. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
United States Supreme Court Protects Aliens' Right to Judicial Review of Motions to Re-open. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:24 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit announces its ruling in Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
  He was extradited from the Netherlands to the United States earlier this week. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:57 pm
I attended the oral arguments this morning at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding the matter of the United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:35 am by Steven Boutwell
The district court agreed with Maersk, holding that since the contract was negotiated and executed outside the United States, it was not an offer to sell within the United States. [read post]