Search for: "United States v. Lawrence" Results 641 - 660 of 1,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
We live today in a global community¡V in particular, a global legal community¡V and we would like to foster legal scholarship on a transnational basis. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Post, with commentaries by Pamela Karlan, Lawrence Lessig, Frank Michelman, and Nadia Urbinati. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The claims were issued on 6 October 2022 by Hamlins Solicitors on behalf of six individuals: Baroness Doreen Lawrence; Prince Harry; Sir Elton John and David Furnish; Elizabeth Hurley; and Sadie Frost. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
  In The Atlantic, Lawrence Lessig contends that the federal government “should have used originalism to sway originalist Justices,” while in the New Republic, Jeffrey Rosen argues that Justice “Thomas’s definition of corruption – and the one embraced by the Court in Citizens United — is far narrower than the one the Framers of the Constitution endorsed. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
” More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
” In addition to jeopardizing outcomes in cases such as Loving, Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, following such guidance in Dobbs would also endanger Plyler v. [read post]