Search for: "United States v. Martinez" Results 641 - 660 of 877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the February 21, February 28, March 7, and March 21 Conferences) Martinez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:19 pm by Lindsay M. Harris
Martinez issued an 18-page order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in the Mendez Rojas v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
United States (08-1595) – originally Conference 10.30 Noriega v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, accepting as true the facts alleged in the complaint and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am by Dwight Sullivan
  Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
  A subsequent state habeas petition from Cook, 10-9742, was then put on hold for Martinez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by SHG
Scalia, naturally, dissented, because somebody has to take one for the team.Unfortunately, the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court ends right about the Texas border, where the 5th Circuit has decided that Martinez may be fine for the United States, but has no place in the Republic of Texas. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am by Anna Christensen
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]