Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 641 - 660 of 1,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Minnesota: State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
At the time of the bench trial, Via Varejo had pending applications for three Casas Bahia service marks in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm by Thomas James
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:13 am by Eric Goldman
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
As the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently noted in Bruce Munro and Bruce Munro Studio v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (which hears all appeals in federal cases filed in the states between North Dakota, Minnesota, Arkansas, and Nebraska), reversed a preliminary injunction imposed by the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Baird
On Februrary 3, Adidas, following-through on its promise to take appropriate action barring a satisfactory response, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Riedell, here, in Portland federal district court ("home court" for German-based Adidas in the United States). [read post]