Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 641 - 660 of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 1:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 10-5258, is yet another Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by David Oscar Markus
"[I]n determining whether reforms are needed, and especially in determining whether the existing guideline should be burdened with even more adjustments, the Commission should examine whether our system already provides an adequate solution for the claimed 'unacceptable' outcomes the Department complains about," Gleeson wrote in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am by Karen Tani
The National History Center Webinar, Protest and Civil Unrest in the United States: An Historical Exploration, is up on YouTube. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
Pierce, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:24 am by Amy Howe
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
  However, Article III of the Constitution provides for state-versus-state lawsuits, for which the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm by axd10
Journals BNA's Employment Discrimination Report Employee Relations Law Journal Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal Fair Employment Practices Guidelines (EBSCO, 2001-last year) Labor Lawyer Library of Congress Subject Headings Class Actions (Civil Procedure)—United States Discrimination in Employment Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- United States Sex discrimination against Women Sex discrimination in employment -- Law… [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]