Search for: "United States v. Nice"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 am
These rights are named after Miranda v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
Fortunately for Apple, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, while aware of what the media reported, will (have to) rule on a different basis.I don't disagree with Apple philosophically. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
Lynch, who is the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, to request that she vacate two of Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
Constitution contains the following provision: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
The Solicitor General wrote the court to inform it that the previous brief had been submitted on behalf of the United States, and that no agency-specific briefs would be forthcoming. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Last week, a unanimous Supreme Court of the United States agreed that the appointments at issue were invalid. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
United States, 134 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:06 pm
See NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
