Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 641 - 660 of 1,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  There was only one plausible meaning: “the claim means exactly what the reference on the packaging says it does. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Changes made to address similar findings on the processor issue in the CUSMA challenge were met with a sharp rebuke from the United States and a new trade challenge. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by Michael Silverman
Gray was also a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1979 to 1991. [read post]
11 May 2015, 12:18 am by Steve Baird
Move over likelihood of confusion, there is another sheriff in town, at least when it comes to looking for guidance on best practices and strategic considerations for a brand owner’s clearance, registration, protection and enforcement of trademark rights in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Thus, those accused packages can only infringe indirectly. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
This package of proposals has sparked an enormous counter-reaction. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
Issues on appeal McCutcheon and the RNC packaged their challenge into five separate questions. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Specifically, the court was asked to decide if the legislature, by including these items within the definition of “tobacco products,” violated the due process clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:44 am by Eric Schweibenz
On December 21, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Spansion, Inc. v. [read post]