Search for: "United States v. Rivers" Results 641 - 660 of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Montana (Granted )Docket: 10-218Issue(s): Whether the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes requires a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the state joined the Union.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Montana)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of History Professors et al. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
The city whose river used to regularly catch on fire in the 1970's? [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Suppose, however, a state government proposes a constitutional amendment declaring that the United States is a Lutheran Commonwealth or proposes to overturn by all lawful means a judicial decision forbidding states from declaring the state is a Lutheran Commonwealth. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Will Korn
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:13 pm
But that's what United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Measles outbreaks, navigable rivers, and a winey circuit split.] [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am by skelly
Harvey is the wettest tropical cyclone on record in the United States with peak accumulations of 64.58 inches. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:08 am by Amy Pierce and Anthony B. Cavender
§ 455(a), which provides that any judge “of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. [read post]