Search for: "V-lawyer" Results 641 - 660 of 67,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
"Catherine Roraback, 87, Influential Lawyer, Dies": The New York Times today contains an obituary that begins, "Catherine Roraback, a lawyer who pressed the Connecticut case that eventually led the United States Supreme Court to rule that laws banning the use of contraceptives were unconstitutional, a precursor to its Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 11:35 am by Beaver Courie
Grandparents Rights Lawyers in Fayetteville NC The North Carolina Court of Appeals in Alexander v Alexander ruled on March 16, 2021 the NC Grandparent visitation law violated a mother’s constitutional rights. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday denied certiorari [order list, PDF] in Wilner v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:56 am by Robert Ambrogi
This surprised me, primarily because I thought eFax no […] The post Comparing Fax-to-Email Services: eFax v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:56 am by Robert Ambrogi
This surprised me, primarily because I thought eFax no […] The post Comparing Fax-to-Email Services: eFax v. [read post]
14 Jul 2006, 3:13 am
[JURIST] The highest-ranking lawyers from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines weighed in on how terror detainees should be judged during a Thursday Senate Armed Services Committee hearing [witness list] on the impact of Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 4:48 pm by Howard Bashman
Sarah Rumpf-Whitten of Fox News reports that “Trump names Dean John Sauer as US solicitor general; Sauer was Trump’s lead counsel in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:01 pm
Todd Smith’s  blog TEXAS APPELLATE  LAW BLOG:   In Cluck v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:53 am
Regina (Prudential plc and Another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax Queen's Bench Division "Rather than apply legal advice privilege to a wider range of professionals than lawyers, its application to advice given by lawyers should be restricted, on a review of the policy and the public-interest considerations that underlay legal professional privilege. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:37 pm
As usual, they have a very complete post laying out this issue, focused on the defense lawyers' perspective but much of it applies to plaintiffs' lawyers as well. [read post]