Search for: "Venkat"
Results 641 - 660
of 798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2011, 4:43 am
Yesterday, Venkat Balasubramani sent me a gift in this post at Politico by Ben Smith. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
Last week, Venkat Balasubramani at the Technology and Marketing Blog had some good analysis of the case: Another court that’s less than sympathetic towards a lawyer-plaintiff. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:59 pm
As Venkat recently noted, courts are treating threats communicated in social media posts very seriously, even if the threats are fairly unspecific--and even though social media posts are often gratuitously hyperbolic and readers know it. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 11:19 am
(Blog 2012) * a new protip: if you’re involved in a fight, check with your lawyer before discussing said fight on Facebook (Blog 2012) BONUS: My co-blogger Venkat Balasubramani has blogged some protips as well: * Pro-tip: if you’re going to let someone borrow your phone, make sure you don’t have any sexy selfies that can be freely accessed by anyone who accesses the phone. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:51 am
[Others who are wrestling with the moving/naming issue and commenting on it are Venkat Balasubramani @ Spam Notes; Bob Ambrogi @ Law Sites, and again; Ron Coleman @ Liklihood of Confusion; Bruce Carton @ Legal Blog Watch]But the bigger issue is the name of this blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:58 am
So far this year, Venkat and I, and guest bloggers, have already published about that many posts, so it’s been a high-volume year for blogging. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:21 am
In 2014, Venkat blogged a venue ruling, and in 2015, I blogged the plaintiff’s unexpected defeat of YouTube’s Section 230(c)(2) defense even though Section 230(c)(2) seemed tailor-made for a situation like this. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 4:34 pm
A much more detailed analysis of the underlying issues (defamation, Lanham Act, etc.) was provided by Inman's lawyer, Venkat Balasubramani, in this response letter he wrote to Carreon on Thursday. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:40 am
January 3, 2024) NB: Great work on the case by Venkat and team. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
An online defamation lawsuit gone bad from Venkat on the Technology and Marketing Law Blog Up Next . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
Meanwhile, Venkat Balasubramani, a Seattle attorney, expressed his disbelief at his blog, “Spam Notes,” that the survey was conducted using landline phones. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
An online defamation lawsuit gone bad from Venkat on the Technology and Marketing Law Blog Up Next . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:28 am
[In our exchange about this post in draft mode, Venkat wondered about the legal test the court used here. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:06 am
Venkat and I (and our guests) remain committed to telling you what we're seeing and why it matters. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
Venkat does a recap. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Venkat Balasubramani at the Technology and Marketing blog elaborates: It’s unclear as to whether George went to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube and waved around the trademark registration—from the court’s recitation of the facts, it did not seem like George was armed with a registration when she complained to the various networks. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
As Venkat notes, this legal standard has become fertile soil for judicial anarchy. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:45 pm
HT: Venkat [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
In 2010, Venkat Balasubramani wrote about the Cult of Positivity at his blog, Spam Notes. which is no longer there. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:35 pm
For a discussion about this in the context of private employers, see Venkat's post "Private Employers and Employee Facebook Gaffes [Revisited]. [read post]
