Search for: "Venkat"
Results 641 - 660
of 834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2015, 2:08 pm
” Like Venkat, I thought AFP/Getty’s position was mockable from day 1 given copyright law’s strict liability. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:05 am
Eric and Venkat and their merry band make it look effortless. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:04 am
") Read Venkat's post on Re: Philanthropy regarding the session - Praise and Skepticism: "Philanthropy At Its Best" and the Future of the Sector. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:12 am
Venkat followed closely: So I was excited to see that Nicole Black posted a collection of tweets from Susskind's keynote. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
Venkat's writeup [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:37 pm
Venkat's writeup. - Kleffman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
Uh… As Venkat intimates, this case looks pretty clearly like an example of celebrity exceptionalism, i.e., if Venkat or I had posted the photo, the court would have tossed the claim, but when the larger-than-life (both metaphorically and literally) Shaquille O’Neal with millions of followers posts the same photo, magically the common law becomes more malleable. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Eric’s comments: 1) As Venkat notes, there are some parallels between this case and the Gmail/Yahoo email-scanning-for-ads cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
I like Venkat’s suggestions for the steps social media services should take. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
I want to give a special shoutout to Venkat for his help with the brief. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
. __ Eric’s Comments: Venkat calls cases like this infuriating, and that’s putting it mildly. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am
. __ Eric’s Comments: * I agree 100% with Venkat that the state of online contract formation law is a mess. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:40 pm
[Note: it appears Washington made significant changes to its statute before passage, as Venkat's critique illustrates. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:55 am
As Venkat notes, this inquiry parallels who is “another information content provider” for Section 230 purposes. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Note from Bill: Venkat, thanks for sharing this here! [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Venkat spins this ruling as a partial win for Ripoff Report, but I see it as an unfortunate ruling at best. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
[emphasis added] [Venkat’s comments: perhaps in light of this case, “as a public employee, your online posts can come back to haunt you” deserves a spot on this list..] [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
It’s impossible to capture them all, but I’m going to do my best, by saying a heart-felt “thank you” to: Venkat Rangan and Charu Rudrakshi who started the company, raised the first round of funding, and set the DNA of the engineering team; Jim Goetz at Sequoia Capital who acted more as co-founder than investor in the company’s first year, and has since been incredibly supportive of the management team; Tom Dyal at Redpoint Ventures for … [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:28 am
[In our exchange about this post in draft mode, Venkat wondered about the legal test the court used here. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 8:00 pm
Venkat Balasubramani and Eric Goldman's takes on the case can be found in their Technology & Marketing Law Blog and Josh Durham of Poyner Spruill also has a thorough write up). [read post]
