Search for: "Vote v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 9,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 9:32 am by Derek Muller
Consider this language from the Illinois Constitution: Every United States citizen who has attained the age of 18 or any other voting age required by the United States for voting in State elections and who has been a permanent… Continue reading The post Did Moore v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm by Stuart Kaplow
In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
Nebraska, then-House speaker Nancy Pelosi said: People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:19 am by Mark Graber
  When they were considering how to help persons of color become full citizens of the United States, they spoke the language of color consciousness. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The text limits and directs government and future lawmaking, with the United States offering the paradigm example. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am by jonathanturley
In fairness to some of the less bombastic critics, the acceptance of the independent state legislature theory would have produced a radical change in how elections are handled in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:17 am by Rick Hasen
It begins: It is indeed a cause for celebration that the United States Supreme Court, on a 6-3 vote in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
In a decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court rejected the state’s invitation to narrow the scope of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]