Search for: "W. E. Davis" Results 641 - 660 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Maintained by three editors – Wendy Johnson Lario, Glenn E. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 7:46 am
From my interview with Victor Davis Hanson yesterday: [W]e know what happened to the French in 1962, what happened to the Algerians who supported the French. 170,000 of them were butchered within six months. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:19 am
Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and David E. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
After BAPCPA became law, Professor Morrison teamed with Columbia LLM candidate (and now Davis Polk associate) Joerg Riegel to author another article entitled Financial Contracts and the New Bankruptcy Code: Insulating Markets from Bankrupt Debtors and Bankruptcy Judges. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 am
  "[W]e deem these challenges waived and consider them no further," was all the court needed to say. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
[W]e decline to answer thatnormative question without significantly greater assistancefrom the citizenry acting through its Legislature''. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 8:27 am
Yu Copyright, Creativity, Catalogs Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory - Julie E. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
We thought this was also a softball, since there is an IRS opinion letter saying that such pay is a wage, taxable by the federal government as W-2 wage compensation. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 5:56 pm
  In a widely-distributed email, Professor Diane Amman (UC Davis) announced the group blog: [W]e hope that that this  newest entry to the blogosphere will add new voices to discussion on matters of global import — not only overarching questions of war and peace, but also  less-noted events, such as  detention of children and unionization efforts in the developing world. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:46 pm
Plaintiffs' brief, citing to Judge Eugene Pigott -- who had been one of the presiding justices that formulated the rules and has now been elevated to New York's Court of Appeals -- conceded that the rules were not intended to be applied uniformly:Indeed, Justice Pigott, in his public comments about the rules, acknowledged that the presiding justices had not considered how some of the rules would be applied to "the big firms in New York," noting that… [read post]