Search for: "Walling v. Frank"
Results 641 - 660
of 712
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Bills still pending: The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (a.k.a. the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act”) would give the SEC the power to ban or limit mandatory arbitration in certain agreements. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:55 pm
In the recent decision Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
An alert reader who clearly has a lot of patience managed to sift through the thousands of pages of the Conference Committee version of the financial reform bill (the "Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act," which can be found here), and he reports (and my review of the Bill confirms) that the Conference Bill actually addresses the extraterritorial question. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:41 pm
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was passed out of a House-Senate Conference Committee last week seems to provide just the clear statement of congressional intent for extraterritorial jurisdiction of securities law cases that the Court in Morrison was demanding. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
A House-Senate conference committee has reported out the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act providing for a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of US financial services and markets. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm
As my published op-ed explains: "Kagan's scholarship isn't of the off-the-wall variety that we see so often in the academy. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm
Bradford Company v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
Bill Jamieson at the Wall Street Journal discusses the possible implications of the Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 12:24 pm
Barney Frank’s “Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009” (H.R. 4173) is mostly famous for creating a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, it would also “put the FTC on steroids,” in the words of Jim Miller, FTC Chairman from 1981 to 1985. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Privacy Polls v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
v=mHV4nDS501Y -- afforded reason enough to suspect something along these lines even before the latest Republican volte face on the individual mandate. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
By Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer We learned from The Wall Street Journal yesterday that “Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski gets a little peeved when people suggests that he wants to regulate the Internet. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:31 pm
” The other critical part of our “layered approach” to privacy concerns is building a higher “Wall of Separation Between Web and State. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
Am l-o-v-i-n-g the headlines this morning. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
I will select just the articles and posts that I consider especially noteworthy.Day 1 of the trialAndrew Pugno, General Counsel Andy Pugno Comments On Opening Day Of Trial, 01/11/10 ProtectMarriage.com Action FundDan Levine, Gay Couples Testify as Marriage Case Starts, The Recorder (SF legal newspaper), 01/12/10NCLR’s Legal Director Shannon Minter on Perry v Schwarzenegger Proceedings, Day 1, 01/11/10 Pam's House BlendKaren Ocamb, A heavy burden for the Prop 8 defenders, 01/12/10… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:10 pm
Experts for the defendants included Frank Harrison, Dan Wilkins, Bruce Buttner, and Art Klein. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
Rockwood v Patterson Thuente Skaar [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
