Search for: "Walsh v. Walsh" Results 641 - 660 of 1,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2024, 9:34 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  Our very own Director, Anne Walsh, spoke on a panel titled Navigating Today’s Life Sciences M&A Landscape: Charting the Latest Trends and Challenges in Pharma and Biotech Dealmaking. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s oral argument in Montgomery v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 9:50 am by Dean Freeman
Wile’s, Inc., July 28, 2016, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court More Blog Entries: Walsh v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm by Paul Horwitz
 The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
Bavaria v Anheuser-Busch sounds like a Germany-USA match, but it's really the Netherlands versus its old rival Belgium. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by James Romoser
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to any fees for services rendered (see Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Matter of Satin, 265 AD2d 330; Yannitelli v Yannitelli & Sons Constr. [read post]