Search for: "Warner Brothers"
Results 641 - 660
of 736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2008, 2:21 am
Warner and Detective Stabler conclude that the rime is related to the victim's weight. 21. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
So, for example, if I review the new Harry Potter movie, I can use the trademark "Harry Potter" in my review without fear of liability because it is both descriptive of the source of the film (the Harry Potter franchise co-owned by Warner Brothers and J.K. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:02 pm
Warner Brothers argued, among other things, that by accepting the stipend and health insurance after sending a termination letter Mrs. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
Consumers are not likely to get confused as to the source or sponsorship of this blog or the source or sponsorship of the goods bearing the marks discussed herein.If kids want to eat breakfast with Batman, should any cereal manufacturer be entitled to put pictures of Batman on its cereal boxes without Warner Brother's permission? [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
The romantic comedy, based on HBO’s long-running television series of the same name, unexpectedly overtook the latest “Indiana Jones” movie at the domestic box office, bringing in an estimated $55.7 million since opening with midnight shows on Thursday, according to Warner Brothers., which released the film. ...85 percent of the ticket buyers [were] women, many viewing in groups — brought the film about $26 million in sales on Friday. [read post]
29 May 2008, 4:21 pm
(BER-L-9592-02), the verdict found Borg Warner, Inc., of Michigan, and Asbestos Corp. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:51 am
Glendale, CA - Copyright attorneys representing Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Bros. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:14 pm
It might look a lot like the list of companies he works with now: Warner Brothers, Dreamworks, Sony/BMG, NBC Universal, and others, according to his website. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:22 am
Michael Dell's brother. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:51 am
Ruby Keeler, born Ethel Hilda Keeler, (1910-1993), was an actress, singer, and dancer most famous for starring with Dick Powell in a string of successful early musicals at Warner Brothers. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Rowling and Warner Brothers have pushed publishers of other planned Harry Potter reference books in the United States to withdraw them from the market, though without filing suit. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 3:54 am
Rowling and Warner Brothers sued a small publisher that is planning to sell a lexicon/encyclopedia of her work. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:40 pm
Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.) have introduced such legislation, which would tax fuel at the producer level. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:50 pm
Loken had a broad background in artist management, having executive level roles at Ride Management, Fearless Records, William Morris, Warner Brothers Records, and Motown/Polygram Records. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
Rowling and Warner Brothers Entertainment, the company that produces the Harry Potter movies, are suing Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 2:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law
Plan Paying Appealing Plaintiffs $19,000 Difference Between Plans Sought, Awarded Is Fair, Reasonable
In re AOL Time Warner ERISA Litigation Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:55 am
As I said, I do not know enough about this to give an educated opinion, but my guess is the fact that Rowling and Warner Brothers have admitted to using the Lexicon before will count against them. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
Rowling and Warner Brothers filed suit against RDR, alleging claims for copyright and trademark infringement, and seeking to stop publication of the book.The issue is fair use, the most misunderstood area of copyright law. [read post]
