Search for: "Waters v. U.s.*"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
(citing Bennet v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
See Waters v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
More recently, in Lozman v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:41 am
Namely, just as Congress abrogated the Court’s decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
Shqeirat v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am
United States — in which the Supreme Court held that the Clean Water Act does not regulate all wetlands, but without a majority opinion explaining why that is so — should be revisited to adopt the plurality’s test for wetlands jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, in which only those wetlands that have a continuous surface water connection to regulated waters may themselves be regulated. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Sepulvado v. [read post]
CAFA’s Local Event Exception Does Not Constrain the Event or Occurrence to a Discrete Moment in Time
12 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
” International Paper relied on Allen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
In Reichle v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
In ASARCO v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 2:32 pm
In Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
Waters Techs. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
Waters Techs. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court decision Babbitt v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:18 am
Supreme Court had invalidated a similar provision about civilians wearing military uniforms in Schacht v. [read post]
