Search for: "William V. Johnson" Results 641 - 660 of 1,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 12:41 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Manley of the Lemoyne, PA law firm of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner and I thank them for that.Anyone wishing to review this Williams decision, may click this LINK [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:41 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Manley of the Lemoyne, PA law firm of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner and I thank them for that.Anyone wishing to review this Williams decision, may click this LINK [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” While the Eighth Circuit similarly upheld immunity based on the facts in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:05 am by Harold O'Grady
Other members of the panel are retired Brooklyn Law Professor William Hellerstein, Ian Ayres of Yale Law School, Alafair Burke of the School of Law at Hofstra University, Miriam Gohara, visiting assistant professor at Columbia Law School, Taja-Nia Henderson of Rutgers School of Law-Newark, Tanya Hernandez of Fordham University School of Law, Conrad Johnson of Columbia Law School, K. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
For an example of this complex balancing test in action, consider the district court case Johnson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  I was doing research in William Fulbright’s papers at the University of Arkansas. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:30 am
Here's a case where a Ninth Circuit panel whose prior opinion was summarily reversed by the Supreme Court says it'd be just fine were the Court to do so again.I was actually thinking last week about what a generally frivolous waste it is for litigants to file rehearing petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
  In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:07 am by Jon
It took until 1812 for the case to make it to the Supreme Court, by which time the issue was so settled that prosecution counsel didn't even bother to show up in court, and Justice William Johnson, Jefferson's first appointee to the Supreme Court, writing for a unanimous Court, rightly decided that defense arguments were correct, and that there was no authority for common law crimes. [read post]