Search for: "Williams v. Cover"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
She emphasised that the question of copying is one of quality, not quantity (Ladbrokes v William Hill) and that a substantial part of a work will have been copied if the parts taken express the intellectual creation of the author (Infopaq). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:27 am
In Comm. of the Judiciary v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
The following is the introduction to the Report’s cover page: “Just after the dawn of the Atomic Age and during the height of the Cold War, the United States conducted 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands of the central Pacific. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
.: The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) will hear testimony from Jennifer Williams, the special advisor for Europe and Russia in the office of the vice president, and Lt. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Williams v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Pink Cripps is a sweet, crunchy variety of apple developed by crossing the Lady Williams and the Golden Delicious. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
The hearing will feature testimony from William B. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Takeaway: 77m did not disclose its real purpose for licensing the INSPIRE data or negotiate terms that actually covered the intended use. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:07 am
See, Poschmann v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
From the Watergate era, we covered the foundational work of Raoul Berger and Charles L. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Next up in the DOJ was William Ruckelshaus, who also refused. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
” At Understanding the ADA, William Goren unpacks the oral arguments in Harris and Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
In Peter v. [read post]
