Search for: "Williams v. Michigan, State of" Results 641 - 660 of 712
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
William Jefferson (D-La.). [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
The State - Homeless Sex Offender ChallengeBelow this message are a couple articles about the case that was argued in the Georgia Supreme Court this past Monday, Santos V. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton    Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06  2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton    Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06  2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court relied heavily on its 1986 ruling in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:21 am
Daniel Halberstam (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States (RULING THE WORLD? [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Williams, No. 06-694 A statute criminalizing, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography is neither overbroad under the First Amendment nor impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Rutter, No. 06-1473 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against several employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections challenging plaintiff's placement and continued confinement in administrative segregation, dismissal pursuant to section 1997e(c) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court erred in dismissing a due process claim on the ground that the duration of plaintiff's prison discipline, three years and… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests… [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:09 am
Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), and reaffirmed in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:29 am
Williams      This lawsuit was filed in and is pending in the U.S. [read post]