Search for: "v. Holder et al"
Results 641 - 660
of 921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
A number of the briefs highlighted the recent Wolk v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:59 pm
A.V.E.L.A., Inc., et al. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:15 pm
Southern Illinois Hospital Services, et al. and Howell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:21 pm
Holder ACLU et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Holder, 10-694, and Johnson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:15 am
Medtronic Inc., et. al. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
SanDisk Corporation, et al., United States District Court, ND Cal., Case No. 5:10-CV02787-JF/HRL, the court denied a motion to dismiss in a Walker Process "fraud on patent office" case, and allowed standing to a direct purchaser. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
The case, American Civil Liberties Union, et al., v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN and Rogers, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:33 am
New Black Panther Party for Self Defense, et al. (09-CV-0065). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Phoenix Trading, Inc., et. al. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
The Eleventh Circuit case (Florida, et al., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
The Appeals Court said, "A common sense reading of the statute and existing state law persuade us that this permittee, as the holder of a possessory interest, cannot be such an 'owner' under CERCLA, and we so hold. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
Holder, et al., F. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm
Holder (Attorney General), et al. (10-545). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:00 am
On its website, the German Collection Society “VG Wort” now informs us that it has again written to Judge Denny Chin of the New York District Court in relation to the “Google Book Settlement” case (The Author’s Guild et al v Google, Inc., case no 1: 05-cv-08136 (DC)).In its letter to the court of 14 February 2011 (which can be retrieved via VG Wort’s website by clicking here (in English)) the German Collection Society requests an… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
" But unlike Lemley et al., who argue that § 101 independently limits claim scope, Feldman says that "this limitation could be accomplished through the disclosure requirements of section 112. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
" This is very similar to the argument by Lemley et al. that § 101 is about claim scope, not gatekeeping.In Part II, Dreyfuss and Evans apply these ideas to patents on genetic diagnostics, which is a subset of what are often called "gene patents," and I will use the "gene patent" shorthand in this post. [read post]
