Search for: "APPOINTMENT OF JUSTICES"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 24,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 6:50 am
The government filed a short motion this morning, asking the Court to appoint a CIPA (Classified Information Security Officer) to watch over the classified information that it will be disclosing to the defense and the Court in its response. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
There will be no stealth appointment anymore. ... [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
If a retirement, death or removal of a Justice results in there being fewer than nine Justices, including Senior Justices, a new Justice or Chief Justice shall be appointed and considered as the Justice required to be appointed during that Congress, if that appointment has not already been made. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 10:53 am
But at a time when our politics are so polarized; when norms and customs of our political rhetoric seem to be corroding – this is precisely the time we should treat the appointment of a Supreme Court justice with the seriousness it deserves. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:48 am
They were, of course, appointed by a conservative President, Ronald Reagan. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:07 am
The appointment of an expanded panel (three judges is usual), including the Chief Justice, is notable, and suggests that the court considers the question of whether a machine can be an inventor for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 to be one of particular legal importance. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court of Canada’s unusual request to re-hear a case in order to allow newly appointed Justice Clément Gascon to participate has led many observers to assume an even split among judges, requiring a tiebreaker — but there are other possibilities to consider.The request was sent yesterday to counsel in Conception v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
Yesterday, the Miami Herald ran a story that you can read about here.Judge Gelber, who is 94 years old, was appointed to the bench in 1974. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:18 pm
Justice Funt found that in the circumstances the executor would not be prejudiced. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:13 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia asked. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
Repeals the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments ActFISC Reform: Increases term to 10 years but no reappointment Appointment of Special Masters to advise court (persons w/technological expertise) Warrant Requirement: Requires probable cause warrant to obtain info. on USP under FISACALEA: Gov't cannot require companies to build in accessWhistleblower Complaints: Gov't employee or contractor can file complaint on FISA violation/mismanagement to Comptroller or Intel. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:34 pm
Ken Clarke, Justice Secretary and splendidly attired Lord Chancellor at the Opening of Parliament observed…“The appointments process (for judges) must fully respect and maintain the independence of the judiciary, and appointment on merit must remain absolutely at the heart of the process,” said Clarke. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:21 am
This morning the justices issued orders from last week’s conference. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
The president has made no secret of his unhappiness with Mueller’s appointment, publicly mulling whether to fire him and berating Sessions for the recusal that Trump believes led to the special counsel’s appointment. [read post]
7 May 2019, 10:38 am
Groban, the newest Justice appointed by former Governor Brown, will speak. [read post]
7 May 2019, 10:38 am
Groban, the newest Justice appointed by former Governor Brown, will speak. [read post]
7 May 2019, 10:38 am
Groban, the newest Justice appointed by former Governor Brown, will speak. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am
Newsmax reports that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not pleased by recent calls for her to resign to allow the president to appoint her successor. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:19 am
Defendants with no financial resources are often appointed lawyers who do not have their best interests at heart or are simply not competent to handle complex criminal cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
All nine Justices believe they are "following the law" when they vote in 5-4 decisions, but the dissenters follow it to a different conclusion than the Justices who comprise the majority. [read post]
