Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 26,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2015, 7:01 pm
(i) All persons who consumed food and drink at a McDonald’s Restaurant in Northport, Alabama on March 14, 2012 or on March 16, 2012, and who thereby were required to get vaccinations against HAV following their potential exposure to HAV; and (j) More than 700 claimants who consumed food or drink purchased at a Papa John’s restaurant in Charlotte, North Carolina in March and April 2014, and who thereby were required to get vaccinations against HAV following… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
His report is almost always helpful to the claimant's case. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:39 pm
In fact, as the decision reflects that: [o]nce she established that she was paid less for performing substantially similar work, it was not [Claimant's] burden to prove that it was gender bias that led to the unequal pay but Citicorp’s burden to prove that it was not gender bias. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
If the publication didn’t defame the claimant, the claim fails at the first hurdle and that’s the end of the matter. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
Christie’s Inc., 62 F.4th 64 (2d Cir. 2023). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
It took 13 years for the Claimant’s bar to level the playing field. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:10 pm
The Plan provided benefits for the first 24 months of disability if a claimant was unable to perform his “own occupation. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:17 am
At least in cases involving third-party claimants, Lexis’s scorecard is a bit simplistic. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
The ALJ first determines the claimant’s residual functional capacity ("RFC"). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:30 pm
• Dates of diagnoses, hospitalizations, doctor’s visits, treatments, or operations may be included. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:04 am
Today’s post comes from guest author Thomas Domer, from The Domer Law Firm. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
In the circumstances the insurer’s reliance on the exclusion was upheld. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
The underlying claim arose from a motor vehicle accident that allegedly caused injuries to a passenger on the insured’s motorcycle. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
In the circumstances the insurer’s reliance on the exclusion was upheld. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:58 pm
The practical effect of this limited standard of review was to make it exceedingly difficult for a claimant to win. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:42 pm
This court said yes and reversed the District Court's dismissal of the claim. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 am
Selwood v Durham County Council and others [2012] EWCA Civ 979; [2012] WLR (D) 231 “When determining whether a defendant owed a common law duty of care to a claimant in respect of the actions of a third party on the basis of foreseeability, proximity and fairness, justice and reasonableness, in accordance with the test laid down in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, there was no need to show that the defendant had assumed any responsibility for the… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:48 pm
Weekly D909, 1st DCA 2011, the court held that Florida Statute Section 440.02(1) required the claimant to establish the level of mold to which the claimant was exposed in the workplace. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
You may see this expression in a federal court decision when the ALJ's credibility determination fails to articulate why the claimant's allegations of disability were contradicted by the claimant's activities of daily living. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am
Following a protocol letter by Ms Cort’s solicitors, Lambeth Legal responded inn a second letter that Our client does not consider that your client’s age and ethnicity are exceptional, nor do they provide justification for exercising the Council’s powers and/or discretion in your client’s favour. [read post]
