Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6581 - 6600 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
PwC v SAAD Investments Company Ltd (In Liquidation), heard 29-30 April. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:20 pm
Index the publications: (a) for contradictory statements for use in impeachment, (b) for general principles supportive of your theory, and (c) for embarrassing quotations about the limits of the expert’s knowledge. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:08 pm by nedaj
These new provisions provide that an issuer is disqualified from relying on Rule 506(b) and 506(c) of a Regulation D offering if the issuer or any other “covered person” has a relevant disqualifying event. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 4:15 pm
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 4:15 pm
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 11:15 am by Stephen Bilkis
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 11:15 am by Stephen Bilkis
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:14 pm by Lyle Roberts
The individual agent who uttered or issued the misrepresentation; b. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TM is concerned with one kind of generalization: source information—who is responsible b/c of the presence of mark. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm by Florian Mueller
There are special rules in the contract for a "Deferred Android Device", defined as "an Android/Chrome Device that (a) does not have voice communication as a primary functionality, (b) has web browsing as a primary functionality and (c) has a display screen no larger than 6.25 inches across its diagonal. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:52 am by Daniel Shaviro
., Starbucks in the UK, since it isn't a UK company). [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
It is indicated, in combination with cisplatin, (a) for the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, or (b) for the initial treatment of locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:14 am by Raymond McKenzie
  (c) The firm’s ownership by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals must be real, substantial, and continuing, going beyond pro forma ownership of the firm as reflected in ownership documents. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 5:33 am by Adam Weinstein
The term “penny stock” generally refers to securities that trades below $5 per share, issued by a small company. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
Class B: A classification used to describe buildings that generally qualify as a more speculative investment, and as such, command lower rents or sale prices compared to Class A properties. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm by Joe Koncelik
 The committee will review and discuss the recommendation and decide whether to: a) proceed to Step 4; b) jump to Step 5 or; c) take no action at the present time. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Chris Coulter and Mercedes Samavi
  This determination was re-affirmed in a recent Advocate General opinion in Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia C-463/12. [read post]