Search for: "D. O. B." Results 6581 - 6600 of 7,575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
Last year in Blawg Review I took on the role of the  Lord of Misrule. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 6:50 am by sevach
Personalmente este año 2009 me ha permitido disfrutar especialmente con el post titulado Diccionario Básico de Humor en el Léxico Judicial así como con el “Cuento de invierno para opositores a funcionario”, y con el placentero saludo a los cyberjuristas del Maestro García de Enterría 4. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am by Michael Geist
  O is for one-click, the controversial Amazon.com business method patent that was denied validity by the Canadian Patent Appeal Board. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm by Julio César Córdoba
Se trata del mismo comentario al fallo SCBA, 04/02/09, B., S. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:31 am by thelawprofessor
Recchia, Jr., Joel Rivera, James Sanders, Jr., Larry B. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:16 pm by sevach
Para Sevach, la situación actual de déficit de financiación universitaria constituye un fenómeno de irresponsabilidad global. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:05 pm by dmk
Best Blawg About Legal Blawgging – Kevin O’Keefe’s Real Lawyers Have Blogs 7. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm by dmk
Best Blawg About Legal Blawgging - Kevin O'Keefe's Real Lawyers Have Blogs 7. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Cole (Georgetown), IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Mary Ellen O'Connell (Notre Dame) (left), Stephen I. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
” Este discurso bélico permitió la confección de un decreto de reformas constitucionales que, desde el día 18 de junio de 2008, comienza a reducir el catalogo de Derechos Fundamentales del gobernado al modificar el párrafo segundo del artículo 16 constitucional y establecer como requisitos para librar una orden de aprehensión que obren -diferente a acreditar- datos que establecen que se ha cometido un hecho sancionado por la… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:32 am by Gustavo Arballo
La ordenanza dice que día por día, la autoridad de aplicación va a decidir a las ocho de la mañana si se va a poder estacionar o no en esa fecha. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:35 am by gmlevine
“Knowledge of Complainant’s rights is an essential part of the bad faith analysis,” Russell Frey d/b/a edHelper v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC’s motion papers explain, in footnote 4, that the FDIC sent the letter to the bank’s primary and first level excess D&O insurers, but not to the second and third level excess D&O insurers, because the second and third level excess insurer’s policies "contain a regulatory exclusion. [read post]