Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 6581 - 6600 of 24,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Jason Johns
  FERC required that the participation model: (1) ensure that a resource is eligible to provide all capacity, energy, and ancillary services that the resource is technically capable of providing, (2) ensure that a resource can be dispatched and can set the wholesale market clearing price as both a wholesale seller and wholesale buyer, (3) account for physical and operational characteristics of electric storage resources through bidding parameters or other means, (4) establish… [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:50 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
To consider this, the Supreme Court needed to bear in mind the following: (1) it is for the court to determine whether the scheme is proportionate (2) the matter should be approached in the same way the CJEU would approach the issue in enforcement proceedings (3) the court has to decide whether the Board has established that the objectives cannot be attained through a less restrictive scheme (4) this does not mean asking whether the Board’s judgment was… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Consumers with questions may contact the company by calling 828-281-4800 x. 180, Monday through Friday from 9 a.m.- 5 p.m. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
Rather . . . in the context of ERISA cases, the Court is to apply a five-factor analysis to determine the appropriateness of an award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party: (1) the degree of culpability or bad faith attributable to the losing party; (2) the depth of the losing party's pocket, i.e., his or her capacity to pay an award; (3) the extent (if at all) to which such an award would deter other persons acting under similar circumstances; (4) the benefit (if any) that… [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by Howard Ullman
 Since corporations can act only through individuals, does the bill by indirect implication exempt corporations, too?) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:36 pm by Michael W. Huseman
If both parties use the account for their mutual benefit, it does not really matter who put the money into the account. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Through his guardian mother, he settled his claim for damages with his pediatrician for that defendant's malpractice insurance policy limit of $1 million. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:26 pm
” There are five proposed exceptions: (1) the performing group is the authorized registrant and owner of a federal service mark for the group; (2) at least one member of the performing group was previously a member of the recording group and has a right to use the group’s name; (3) the performance is identified in advertising as a “salute” or “tribute,” and the name of the performing group is not so… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:46 am by Zak Tomlinson
 The Court held that it did, even though (1) the architect never filed a notice of professional services under RCW 60.04.031(5); and (2) the Bank inspected the property and observed no visible sign of construction. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Emma Fazio
” The October 15 order explains why the MPUC found it necessary to impose this co-location cap and describes how Xcel will “‘scale down’ noncompliant applications to the applicable cap level,” which is 5 MW for applications filed before September 25, 2015, and 1 MW for applications filed between September 25, 2015 and September 15, 2016. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 7:39 am by Steve Worrall
o 75% of women and 80% of men remarry within 5 years after divorce. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:09 am
It does not have a single author. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:14 am by Laura Orr
  UELMA is moving through eight other states’ legislatures, including Oregon. 5) Hawaii is the first state to include judicial documents in their UELMA law. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:29 am
The Commission vote approving the administrative complaint was 4-0-1, with Commissioner Julie Brill recused.The case is In the Matter of The North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, FTC File No. 081 02137, June 17, 2010. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Consumers with questions may contact Personal Care Products at 1-248-258-1555, Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. [read post]