Search for: "First Holding Corporation" Results 6581 - 6600 of 18,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 3:00 am by Broc Romanek
Twist to Fee-Shifting Bylaws: Limit Suing Ability of Small Shareholders As highlighted in this RacetotheBottom blog and Reuters article – and analyzed in this Cooley blog – Imperial Holdings, a Florida corporation, is trying out a permutation on fee-shifting bylaws: requiring plaintiffs to obtain consents to the litigation from shareholders holding shares in excess of a minimum threshold (3% of the outstanding). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 5:43 am by Charles Kotuby
The following are some of the cases discussed in this year’s Survey: *Three Supreme Court decisions, the first declaring unconstitutional all state laws against same-sex marriages, the second interpreting the commercial activity exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act, and the third further constricting the range of state law in matters relating to arbitration; * A Second Circuit decision resuscitating for now that court’s theory that corporations are not… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
It is wrong (Also, holding up a card or saying words like those on the card to parents is just going to make your job a whole lot harder because an 'I owe you NOTHING' introduction is not the best way to build a mutually cooperative trusting relationship). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:07 pm
Home Owners’ Loan Act (HOLA) Preempted Class Action Claims Premised on Scheme to Defraud Senior Citizens into Entering into Reverse Mortgages but Plaintiff given Leave to File Amended Class Action Complaint California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation alleging that “Financial Freedom instituted a complex scheme to defraud senior citizens in the structuring, origination,… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 10:02 pm by Sarah Klein
  The Peanut Corporation of America outbreak in 2008-09 cost all peanut farmers $1 billion in lost sales. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by John Elwood
Other courts hold that the ADA does apply to former employees. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am by Daniel Hemel
The so-called “Bob Richards rule” holds that, absent a different agreement among the parties, a tax refund resulting solely from losses and income generated by one corporate subsidiary should inure to the benefit of that subsidiary—and not to the parent company that files consolidated tax returns on behalf of the whole corporate group. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:19 pm by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Rather, the DIIRSP is for any US taxpayer who has fallen behind on tax documents related to foreign information disclosure, such as: Form 3520: For reporting certain transactions with foreign trusts as well as gifts from foreign individuals, estates, corporations, or partnerships Form 3520-A: For reporting US ownership of foreign trusts Form 5471: For reporting shares you hold in a foreign corporation Form 5472: For US-registered corporations owned 25%… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Could preclude gov’t/corporations from engaging in anonymous speech. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
Ct. 746 (2014), was a game changer the first time we read it. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:15 pm
His corporation sole is in law the record owner of the property (thanks to the fecklessness of the diocesan Standing Committee). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Be sure the employee is on the proper corporate payroll. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background The First Bank of Beverly Hills failed on April 24, 2009. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
(As a New York religious association, originally formed at common law, ECUSA itself cannot hold title to any property, real or personal; it has to do so through its New York corporate counterpart, the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society.) [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
First, the Court found that the fact that pharmaceutical sales representatives were paid so highly provided evidence that they were not who the act was intended to protect. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  No corporation can afford to file an IPR unless the patent in question is a significant threat. [read post]