Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 6581 - 6600 of 76,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  Which seems would have a very good shot at success here. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
 If you elect not to use a tape measurer, it's probably not a good idea to repeatedly call up the DMV (as well as tell the police) that you might up in there and "light up the place". [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm
 Something that is clearly not good enough in other contexts. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:25 am
 Here are some good examples of competing essay exam answers that reach opposite conclusions and yet both of which would receive an "A". [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:59 pm
There's so much in this opinion that's really, really good. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:57 am
  Plaintiff has established that it's probable that he'll prevail on the merits.Oops.That summary judgment motion that you were thinking about filing later on now looks much less likely to succeed.Sometimes a victory on appeal ain't as good as it initially appears. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
  I gotta admit that it's not an especially good story, however.And the fact that this guy had previously been convicted four times for illegal reentry doesn't help him either.My money's on the dude being convicted at retrial. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 11:58 am
  Joined by Judges Rawlinson and Bybee.It's a relatively good draw for the immigration petitioner. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
 Judge O'Scannlain holds that San Diego can't require "good cause" in order to grant a permit to carry a concealed weapon. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
 Judge Reinhardt does a very good job of recounting the very detailed and exceptionally credible stories relayed by these two asylum petitioners.Judge Reinhardt doesn't actually give 'em asylum. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:04 pm
 It is a totally simple case.But it is nonetheless a mark of a good lawyer that s/he is able to make totally erroneous arguments look at least plausible and/or facially appealing. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
We don't trust in-custody inmate testimony because (inter alia) we're concerned  -- for good and empirical reasons -- that inmates might lie and incriminate another prisoner to get a reduced sentence in their own case.We don't trust accomplice testimony for identical reasons.As a result, in California, you've got to have corroboration. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 2:19 pm
San Diego attorney Jonathan Capp receives some good news today from the Ninth Circuit, which reinstates (in part) his lawsuit against the County of San Diego in a matter arising out of its child welfare investigation of his family (while he was in the midst of divorce proceedings).But be careful what you wish for.The Ninth Circuit holds that Capp -- who's representing himself -- has adequately pled a retaliation claim. [read post]