Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 14,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
District Court Judge Keith Ellison denied Will’s pleas for a new trial but wrote that he lamented doing so because of “disturbing uncertainties” raised about his guilt.Will is hoping the court’s ruling in Martinez will allow him to argue that he should get a new trial because both his trial lawyer and his state-appointed habeas lawyer were ineffective when they failed to track down several witnesses who have testified that the other man confessed to… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:12 am
While the case was pending, there was much speculation about what Caperton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
The matter is not entirely clear, partly because of Garcetti v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
But, in the spirit of the Law School, I won’t let this admiration get in the way of what I hope will be a fierce argument of ideas. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:33 am
Handsome Brook Farm, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 11:02 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:24 am
Since the argument in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In Flatt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
But Justices Brennan and Marshall relentlessly dissented in every death penalty case, and Justice John Marshall Harlan was the lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:44 pm
By way of comparison, see Rankin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
James School v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
I think the former is the primary characteristic of birds, and I am hoping it's the latter Feynman (if in fact he's the author) wanted to imply about the primary characteristic of scientists as the target of the analogy. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
The case was NASA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:07 am
” Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Maybe not having the right to do so… Surely by now you have heard of the landmark decision, Goodridge v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
