Search for: "Head v State"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 14,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Remember what Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:22 am
This is furthermore confirmed by the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO which state that an application may not be refused directly after the reply to a communication under Rule 161(1) EPC (Guidelines C-V, 14).1.2.2 The "Invitation pursuant to Rule 137(4) EPC and Article 94(3) EPC" can also not be considered a substantive communication under Article 94(3) EPC.A communication under Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) EPC is a substantive communication, taking into account any… [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
This development has left me scratching my head on at least two fronts. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:13 am
(“NGS”) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 am
After the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Warger v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
And now on to our little time-capsule case, Swisher v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm
Dette vil være tilfelle ved dypdykk i de fleste tema. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
(Allen v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am
Absent mandatory language in the regs, or court decisions like Doe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Last year we wrote a post on the OSHA Law Update blog regarding one very significant, recent case impacting this PPE analysis — Sec’y of Labor v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 6:45 am
You may bow your head in shame or shake in frustration. [read post]
1 Sep 2005, 3:35 pm
"Frank stopped himself in mid sentence realizing that he was talking to an ambassador from the evil planet "V" and back tracked with noteworthy grace given his emotional state. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:20 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
As the conference heads into its second quarter-century, the programme and faculty are as impressive as ever. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:59 am
The head lessor is Canary Riverside Estate Management Ltd (CREM) (a John Christodoulou company – via the Yiannis Group of companies). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:27 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
With that background, consider the New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent decision in Templo Fuente de Vida Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
