Search for: "In The Matter Of:" Results 6581 - 6600 of 353,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2020, 9:07 am by Howard Bashman
“Leo Strine, Delaware’s Colorful Corporate-Law Czar, Joins New York Firm; 56-year-old will advise Wachtell’s clients on mergers, litigation and other matters”: Liz Hoffman has this article in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 6:40 pm by Howard Bashman
“Democrats Are Pursuing the Wrong Impeachment Charges Against President Trump; It would be better to make a case around provable facts rather than a matter of judgment”: Law professor Clark D. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:14 pm
"The Trump Administration Just Asked The Supreme Court To Uphold The Decision To End DACA; The Justice Department wants the high court to hear the case soon and settle the matter by the end of June": Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News has this report. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:24 pm by Howard Bashman
“UNC Defends Admissions Policies in Suit Alleging Unfair Racial Preferences; Group suing Chapel Hill clashes with school over how much race matters in admissions”: Melissa Korn and Nicole Hong of The Wall Street Journal have this report. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:44 am by Howard Bashman
“How the Court Could Limit Abortion Rights Without Overturning Roe: No matter which path the court takes, the destination will likely be the same — the end of access to safe, legal abortion for many women. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:46 am by Howard Bashman
“Speech Rights for Trump, but Not DeRay Mckesson: The Black Lives Matter organizer was sued for ‘negligently’ leading a protest at which someone else became violent. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Penn Law School Mob Scores a Victory: Now Black Lives Matter wants Amy Wax fired for arguing that preferences harm their ‘beneficiaries.'” Heather Mac Donald has this essay online at The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 7:48 am by Howard Bashman
“The Constitution Is Alive, No Matter What Trump Does; The 230-year-old document fits America’s modern democracy because it has evolved to do so”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:36 pm
"The Only Constitutional Right That Matters: Conservative judges want to protect domestic abusers' right to bear arms; Why don't they care about protecting the right to vote? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:28 am
"Who Controls the Senate Controls the Courts: With a Republican victory in the Senate looking increasingly likely, the President's ability to appoint federal judges is about to be curtailed; And that matters a lot. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
“Courts Must Decide How Much ‘Deference’ to Give Trump; The legal term that turned the travel ban case also matters for the border wall and census suits”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:34 am
"The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Hillary Clinton's Judicial Nominees; As a matter of constitutional law, the Senate is fully within its powers to let the Supreme Court literally die out": Ilya Shapiro has this essay online at the Federalist. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:22 pm
"The Upcoming Supreme Court Cases That Matter Most to States and Localities: In the term that starts Oct. 2, the justices will hear cases that could drastically alter the country's political, financial and social landscape. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
CONGRESSIONAL PORK APOLOGISTS TELL US THAT EARMARKS DON’T MATTER BECAUSE THEY’RE A TINY FRACTION OF THE BUDGET: So why all the excitement about those AIG bonuses that represent only a tiny fraction of the bailout money? [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Justice Department’s Shameful Rush to Federal Executions: The push to impose the federal death penalty no matter the cost poses a grave threat to the rule of law. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:40 pm
"Supreme Court finds history is a matter of opinions; Justices rely more than ever on the idea of constitutional 'original intent' in ruling on cases this year -- yet their decisions are still split": David G. [read post]