Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 39,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
” “Thousands of organisations are processing billions of bid requests in the UK each week with (at best) inconsistent application of adequate technical and organisational measures to secure the data in transit and at rest, and with little or no consideration as to the requirements of data protection law about international transfers of personal data. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:10 pm
I listened today to the Supreme Court’s first ever telephonic oral argument, in USPTO v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:17 am
Religion and Contraception On Wednesday, the Justices take up two cases that have been consolidated for arguments: Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:00 am
On Wednesday at 10:00 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
And the Plaintiffs claimed that the Little Tucker Act itself was unconstitutional: In the Tucker Act and Little Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:13 pm
Because the court left open the question, there’s relatively little guidance as to what additional measures online platforms are actually required to take. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
1 May 2020, 10:52 am
Today at noon, we held a webinar before the oral argument in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
