Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 6581 - 6600 of 44,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, this Court’s power is as broad as that of the trial court, and this Court may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that, in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing [*3]the witnesses” (US Bank N.A. v Pierre, 189 AD3d 1309, 1310 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of… [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
Arkansas, Iowa, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Tennessee all passed statutes increasing the maximum penalty to one year in jail for people who obstruct sidewalks and streets. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:08 pm by Phil Waters
In the federal district court case, Kelley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
” This concept may seem sufficiently broad to allow most plaintiffs’ lawyers recovery of fees, but it certainly does not have that valence after the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Home Care v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
The work must be yours, and you may not seek help from anyone else–including attorneys or law students. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
The Supreme Court of Canada determined that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location, or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed (R v Jarvis 2019 SCC). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
According to FDA, only about 20 percent of the nearly 40 million people who suffer from hearing loss use hearing aids. [read post]
If the public cannot enter or remain on the premises (in whole or part), then the premises may be closed for the purpose of a hybrid clause. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The rules cover a variety of requirements related to how lawyers may practice law. [read post]
For instances, in addition to the above, indoor classes and “other similar gatherings” may only drop their indoor face covering requirements if the gathering does not exceed 100 people and the class is a “stable group of people” who meet together on a regular basis (e.g., no drop-ins for gym classes). [read post]