Search for: "People v. Story" Results 6581 - 6600 of 9,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The BBC has amended the story on its website and issued a clarification of a TV report. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The earlier decision on a (failed) summary judgment application by Facebook has garnered more attention and comment since, and rightly so: the attempt to constrain Facebook’s use of users profiles as part their ‘sponsored story’ advertising has far-reaching implications, for their business model, and for [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
After finding the emails, he forwarded them to a number of people in his wife's and Tom O'Brien's personal network -- using her email address. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
” India Times and ITWire cover the story. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reidenberg: copyright seems like it was pretty ineffective in the main story here. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am by Jeff Welty
State, 747 N.E.2d 539 (Ind. 2001) (not unreasonable for an officer to ask a driver whether he had any weapons; “[t]he question was justified by police safety concerns”), with, e.g., People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Google scores an own goal: Google-funded Intellectual Ventures sues Motorola Mobility (FOSS Patents) (IAM) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica)   Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]